The Daily Iowan

Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

The 60-Vote Rule, which was done away with for SCOTUS nominations, should be reinstated, not only for the sake of the GOP, but for the sake of the integrity of our governmental institutions.

Senators+wait+to+vote+during+the+Senate+Judiciary+Committee+meeting+about+the+Supreme+Court+nominee+Brett+Kavanaugh+Friday+Sept.+28%2C+2018.++in+Washington%2C+D.C.+%28Olivier+Douliery%2FAbaca+Press%2FTNS%29
Back to Article
Back to Article

Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

Senators wait to vote during the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting about the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Friday Sept. 28, 2018.  in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

Senators wait to vote during the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting about the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Friday Sept. 28, 2018. in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

TNS

Senators wait to vote during the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting about the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Friday Sept. 28, 2018. in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

TNS

TNS

Senators wait to vote during the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting about the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Friday Sept. 28, 2018. in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

Collen Mahoney, Opinion Columnist

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






With the 2017 Supreme Court nomination of Neil Gorsuch, Republicans in the Senate toyed around a bit with the vote threshold necessary to confirm Supreme Court justices. Ultimately, the vote count was moved from 60 votes to 50 votes, a significant drop in the percentage of senators necessary to appoint someone to a lifetime position.

The fruits of the change bore their faces once again in the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh, a highly controversial nominee for the nation’s highest court. The GOP (and one Democratic senator) were able to push the nominee through with a slim majority. In fact, only 50 senators voted in the affirmative (which was technically enough because only 98 Senators voted), meaning that only half of the Senate, not even a majority of all members currently seated, voted for Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

RELATED: UI students react to Brett Kavanaugh confirmation

Now, let’s kind of talk about the 60-Vote Rule. Essentially, the rule states that for a Supreme Court nominee to get confirmed, the Senate MUST achieve 60 out of 100 votes in the affirmative. This ensures that it’s not just a political majority but a (usually) bipartisan majority that gets the job done. However, as I stated earlier, that rule was changed by the GOP in 2017.

This was a harsh political misstep and miscalculation on their part.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Senate leadership failed to recognize that they will, inevitably, be voted out at some point. It’s just how our system works. Republicans won’t be in power forever. And when this power exchange does happen, members of the GOP in the Senate wishing to block a Democratic nominee to the Supreme Court are going to really wish they hadn’t changed that rule. They will feel what Democrats in the Senate are feeling right now.

RELATED: Iowa law professors voice opposition to Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation

If McConnell wants to save his own behind, and that of his party, he should reconsider his decision and seek to reinstate the 60-Vote Rule. Not only does it make the confirmation process more bipartisan, making the Supreme Court just a little less of a political institution than it now is (though it was never meant to be), it would also re-establish that precedent that could help them to block nominees they are opposed to when they are in the minority in the future.

McConnell’s move was near-sighted, and he failed to see the big picture. He doesn’t have much time to change it. While I don’t think the GOP will lose the Senate this go round, it’s only a matter of time before Republicans get booted out of the majority and are forced to reckon with their rule changes but this time on the losing side.

Comments

comments

Navigate Left
  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Banerjee: No, movies don’t suck now

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Mahoney: Autonomous cars can be scary, but they don’t have to be

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Jaimes: Porter unfit to represent Johnson County

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Elliot: Heckishness reigns and a man of the soil

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Laursen: 550 words of gratitude for Iowa

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Kumar: The importance of stories about women

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Newby: Prevalence of drug-overdose calls for attention and action

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Helton: Fighting climate change isn’t just for tree huggers anymore

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Weigel: Student Teaching: All Work, No Pay

  • Mahoney: The Importance of the 60-Vote Rule in the Senate

    Columns

    Banerjee: Netflix vs. movie theaters: the importance of seeing movies

Navigate Right